- Joined
- Sep 4, 2009
- Messages
- 7,343
- Reaction score
- 97
Glad I made that preface then.
Thanks for the link, but I probably won't donate. ~6000 black men are killed in America annually- giving special attention to just one death on account of how publicized it is seems pretty knee-jerky.
I dunno.
I'd probably shoot a man ****ing me up.
And unless you could show that it was in self-defense - which this was not - you would be charged with murder.
True.
But my question is..
What will the great and mighty debate team of SWRP do to turn these events injustice that they all so fiercely comment about!?
Please stop trying to sound clever. You're not very good at it.
How?
So let's donate to no one instead?
Makes sense.
You don't think Brown assaulting the police officer and trying to take his gun (the story as presented by the article in question) has any effect on the current spin of him running for his life or trying to surrender and getting gunned down in cold blood?
And yah, I'm aware that that story (including the injury) are presented from a shady site and not likely to be true. But, my interpretation of your question was that it's under the pretenses of the article being credible.
If cops absolutely have to shoot someone, then they should be trained to shoot to wound, if they don't think they have a clear enough shot or the situation is too strenuous, then they should not shoot at all.
Whether it was in self defense or not, by holding a gun, he is the one with power and he is therefore the one responsible for not abusing that power or mishandling it, because he is the one that could end up killing someone or even himself.
It seems to me that racial issues aside, the gun is the problem and the use of that gun is the problem.
It's self-defense when killing the assailant is the only reasonable option in the situation. It was not the only reasonable option here, especially when - according to most witness accounts - Michael Brown was running away.
**** me.