The "Politically Correct" War

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ser Yorick

A Fellow of Infinite Jest
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
22,026
Reaction score
0
Hey man, he's
100sithxt2.jpg
!
 

JKey2003

SWRP Writer
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
334
Reaction score
0
Really tho ... I don't care. I never did shit to them and they fucked with us in NY and DC.

So Fuck em!
 

Ser Yorick

A Fellow of Infinite Jest
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
22,026
Reaction score
0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Feris Kai @ Apr 14 2007, 12:21 AM) [snapback]158965[/snapback]</div>
Really tho ... I don't care. I never did shit to them and they fucked with us in NY and DC.

So Fuck em![/b]
That's like the Muslims saying they hate you because you're all like those guys who did the Oklahoma bombings or whatever. You're stereotyping a religion, for a few bad eggs.
 

Brandon Rhea

Shadow in the Starlight
Administrator
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
67,946
Reaction score
3,861
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Feris Kai @ Apr 14 2007, 12:21 AM) [snapback]158965[/snapback]</div>
Really tho ... I don't care. I never did shit to them and they fucked with us in NY and DC.

So Fuck em![/b]

Those were terrorists who pervert Islam, shit head. Yes, I broke the rules again, because you're being an arrogant and ignorant ****. Don't EVER say that it was Muslims that attacked New York City. Those were NOT Muslims.
 

Kalin Morne

SWRP Writer
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
986
Reaction score
0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Feris Kai @ Apr 14 2007, 12:21 AM) [snapback]158965[/snapback]</div>
Really tho ... I don't care. I never did shit to them and they fucked with us in NY and DC.

So Fuck em![/b]


Two hundred years of western aggression say otherwise. Look up a term called "Blowback". 9/11 was this "Blowback".
 

Cailst

Some Guy
SWRP Writer
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
9,555
Reaction score
31
And the two hundred years of Western aggression were preceded by 1200 years of some muslim aggression except in the cases of the Crusades, the Reconquista, and the conquest of the Golden Horde by Russia.


The terrorists who attacked on 9/11 were muslim though not all muslims are terrorists. I don't know why that seems not to be blatantly clear. However, I would say Islam as a whole has decreased in violence since their baptism of fire in Mecca seeing as they went out and conquered the Middle east, North Africa, Spain and India before getting stopped by the East Romans and the Franks.
 

Ser Yorick

A Fellow of Infinite Jest
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
22,026
Reaction score
0
Oh shut up, it does NOT matter who started it, as it's impossible to know. The whole idea of trying to find out which race/religion is the most racist is a joke. We are NOT going to turn this debate into that.
 

Kalin Morne

SWRP Writer
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
986
Reaction score
0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Noncommunist @ Apr 14 2007, 11:04 AM) [snapback]159027[/snapback]</div>
And the two hundred years of Western aggression were preceded by 1200 years of some muslim aggression except in the cases of the Crusades, the Reconquista, and the conquest of the Golden Horde by Russia.
The terrorists who attacked on 9/11 were muslim though not all muslims are terrorists. I don't know why that seems not to be blatantly clear. However, I would say Islam as a whole has decreased in violence since their baptism of fire in Mecca seeing as they went out and conquered the Middle east, North Africa, Spain and India before getting stopped by the East Romans and the Franks.[/b]

I'd agree with you on the point of the conditions concerning the Battles of Tours and Gargliano, where the Muslims attacked Iberia, France, and Italy. Also, I'll agree with you about Islam forcibly converting the previously Christian areas of Africa and the Middle East. But the Crusades were a response to this, and an attempt to defend ourselves from the antagonistic force of the Muslim empire. The Reconquista was absolutely justified. They took our lands. We took them back. The Golden Horde also weren't Russians, they were Mongols.


In essence, the Muslims started the conflict, but the Europeans finished it. I'm talking about the period after the Europeans won. Starting around 1800, we started to severely meddle in the affairs of these weakened, defeated nations. This is the part that's inexcusable.

Also, yes. The Muslims who attacked were Muslim. However they're a different branch of Islam, they're extremists.
 

Ser Yorick

A Fellow of Infinite Jest
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
22,026
Reaction score
0
Enough. Anything after this post on that will be deleted.
 

Kalin Morne

SWRP Writer
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
986
Reaction score
0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(adroit @ Apr 14 2007, 12:09 PM) [snapback]159057[/snapback]</div>
Enough. Anything after this post on that will be deleted.[/b]


The discussion about the origins of the conflict between the Middle East and Europe is vital to this discussion as this is a discussion about the nature of Political Correctness. If a set knowledge of Who started the conflict is not explored then we cannot examine the nature of if it's Politically correct to say who started it, or if it's simply historically correct.
 

Ser Yorick

A Fellow of Infinite Jest
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
22,026
Reaction score
0
The title of this thread is deceiving, as it is ACTUALLY about what Imus said on the radio show, which is NOT about political correctness. And there is a difference between political correctness anyway, and who started the racism bash against the muslims and europeans, which we are NOT discussing.
 

Kalin Morne

SWRP Writer
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
986
Reaction score
0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(adroit @ Apr 14 2007, 12:15 PM) [snapback]159059[/snapback]</div>
The title of this thread is deceiving, as it is ACTUALLY about what Imus said on the radio show, which is NOT about political correctness. And there is a difference between political correctness anyway, and who started the racism bash against the muslims and europeans, which we are NOT discussing.[/b]

Debates often deviate away from the beginning of the topic and go into other avenues. They're very fluid. Very dynamic. The topic of the debate turned to the nature of Political Correctness in America.


Also, it's a good thing me and Noncommunist weren't talking about Islam being Racist or not, huh?
 

Ser Yorick

A Fellow of Infinite Jest
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
22,026
Reaction score
0
You've been told numerous times, that's enough, Kalin.
 

Kalin Morne

SWRP Writer
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
986
Reaction score
0
Okay, I'm talking to Brandon about this. You're throwing your weight around and hampering the discussion, which has actually taken a civil tone.
 

JKey2003

SWRP Writer
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
334
Reaction score
0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(adroit @ Apr 14 2007, 12:15 PM) [snapback]159059[/snapback]</div>
The title of this thread is deceiving, as it is ACTUALLY about what Imus said on the radio show, which is NOT about political correctness. And there is a difference between political correctness anyway, and who started the racism bash against the muslims and europeans, which we are NOT discussing.[/b]

Precisely why I stopped posting after being called a dumbass and an ignorant ****. We have been off topic for some time now ... but the topic is probably exhausted anyways.
 

Ser Yorick

A Fellow of Infinite Jest
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
22,026
Reaction score
0
And I apologize for the language used in that, and how you were treated, but some of the things you were saying were pretty out there.

But anyway, I too think we've said enough on this topic.
 

Brandon Rhea

Shadow in the Starlight
Administrator
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
67,946
Reaction score
3,861
There was ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to lock this thread. Debates generally deviate from the original topic and so long as it is done in a civil and respectful tone then there is nothing wrong with that.

Topic unlocked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top