TF-1149

[Caine]

Uhm Prudii. How does a losing a 9 mil ship give you 15 million credits? Your not making your argument look any stronger here.

 

[Nor'baal]

Regardless, I have said my piece, and will leave it up for Green Ranger to read.
I'll leave the rest of the discussion to you lot, unless you need anything clarified, in which case just tag me :)

 

[Prudence]

Not intentionally. I have stated all I know about our financial state, I'll allow Brett to address those. He always ram the corporate side of things.

 

[Prudence]

Uhm Prudii. How does a losing a 9 mil ship give you 15 million credits? Your not making your argument look any stronger here.

Norby was calculating it as 15 (see jump from 40 mill spent to 55 mill spent)

 

[Zay]

Sorry for stating this Norbs but I don't believe the Bounty would still be dead since I believe the bounty came from the Grand Loorda(and may or may not have been publicly stated by someone else). Maybe @ZayPat can clear this up?

KES isn't safe. As a matter of fact they are in the same amount of danger as they were before Nor'baal's deal. The Hutt's would never auto remove someone from their bounty list on the word of an Enforcer. There would need to be substantial proof. There isn't, so the bounty stays. If KES if caught in Hutt space they will be attacked.

*EDIT*

I'm also not going to respond to this thread anymore. I'm not in the business of jumping on everything someone posts. I do appreciate SW's vigilance. Thanks brah. I also hope this set a clear vision as to what is happening between KES and the Hutts.

Let's have fun.

 

[Nor'baal]

The substantial proof Zay mentions would have been what would have been done in our thread on Nal Hutta (had KES not run away).

So - Nor'baal the Hutt now looks like an idiot due to KES backing out - so you can have a safe bet on the fact that the moment he finds out, Nor'baal would take every scrap of data he can from the KES offices on the DSC and hand it over to the Cartel. Meaning trying to sell those offices would be a very bad idea.

 

[Outlander]

So, little to no money, no income, breach of contracts, loss of excisting facilities, loss of non-liquid assets. Am I missing anything?

 

[Prudence]

After discussion with Brett, we have decided to abandon this base, for one that is more economically feesable. That is not saying we don't have the 60 mill, or the solid assets, we do, but we have better ideas.