- Joined
- Oct 23, 2013
- Messages
- 703
- Reaction score
- 286
@Roen I think we agree on that. Still people will most likely take offense if the status quo they are used to changes.
What I have seen come up a few times now in the discussion is the understanding on self governance. So far people can play their chars however they like. We see that this policy has created a few issues. The question would be if a very static rule will solve this problem or if it will simply upset people. My prefered solution would be more oversight and not a new rule. The Rules are already a gargantuan monster as it stands right now.
I think we agree on the issue but differ in how best to achieve a solution to it.
I think certain small step aproaches that have been named, such as un-nerfing the force, would be a good first step in the right direction. @Green Ranger mentioned a small step aproach, too. If I remember correctly.
What I have seen come up a few times now in the discussion is the understanding on self governance. So far people can play their chars however they like. We see that this policy has created a few issues. The question would be if a very static rule will solve this problem or if it will simply upset people. My prefered solution would be more oversight and not a new rule. The Rules are already a gargantuan monster as it stands right now.
I think we agree on the issue but differ in how best to achieve a solution to it.
I think certain small step aproaches that have been named, such as un-nerfing the force, would be a good first step in the right direction. @Green Ranger mentioned a small step aproach, too. If I remember correctly.