Just an FYI Rameth, MAC guns would bypass your shields. You'll need to edit your post to account for that.
Unless he has kinetic shields which I've said isn't unheard of, especially on bigger ships that the MAC cannons would target.
I'd leave it Rameth.
Shields have only been around for about 20-30 years in this timeline. tbh I don't see running both ray and particle shields as being feasible for anything but very big ships, because our primitive shield tech would be less power efficient and so only big ships would have the power to run both shields at any sort of useful capacity without draining from other systems. It's also a balance thing; if you raise particle shields, you're safe from ballistics [kinda] but weakened against energy, whereas you raise ray shields and you're safe from energy weapons but not from projectiles. That's how most smaller [Cruisers and below] Rep and Hutt ships should work, imo.
Going back to the shielding, I'm going to stick to my guns here and say that shield tech just should not be advanced enough yet for any ship smaller than a battleship/dreadnought to run two sets of shields at the same time. The power drain would be phenomenal and our technology is nowhere near as advanced as it would be in the KOTOR or RTOJ eras. We just shouldn't be able to do it - neither side should. [This may seem convenient for the projectile-heavy Rep, but it's not. If anything it'll make Hutt fighters more effective against Rep capital ships because bombs/torpedos will bypass ray shields, and if the Rep ships try to counter those weapons, then the Hutt capital ships gun them down with turbolasers.]
I would just like to add that the word Taung has been thrown around a lot during the thread. I just want to make it clear that the Republic doesn't know that the Taung are leading this attack or that they are even involved. Just wanted to make that little tid bit known, no need to change anything or whatever.
So far, none of the NPCs have referred to the Taung as Taung, just an omniscient narrator so far.