Recent content by Reign

@Marf To be very honest, you aren't responsible for the death of my character. I can't say that enough, and I genuinely hope you understand that. A bad rule was. And that is what it is. I know The weight of my statement means little. But the reality is, everyone is punished here except the...

Whatever the interpretations are, questions of mine have been answered through this. While I'm new to the forum, I'm not new to PVP, and I think what I posted serves that end. It sounds like a few people benefited. As I said, intention is not to set a rule or even influence them. If nothing...

As a note, this was reported to admin. I have always used footnotes to highlight things that might be missed despite it being posted I character. I could have elaborated in character why Bauren probably wouldn't have been there. I chose not to because it was predominantly ooc rationale. In...

Fair enough. I did that already.

Lol, what you did, ignoring the passage of time, is bogus no matter where you RP. I highly doubt here is any different. But fair enough. If that is how it works here, it's good to know now before I get too invested. You're right. The name calling won't help. It's juvenile at best. So as I said...

There's rationale in that, sure. But to say it's confirmed when it's objected? It seems more suitable a time to halt the fight and make sure the rule is clear. Or to make sure the reason for the rule is clear.

What I don't understand is why. I get it's a rule, and that's fair. But if someone clearly objects IC, in most forums and combat settings, that's enough. Why is it that it must be OoC here? An objection is an objection, is it not? I get you guys say that that's how it is, but I'm not making the...

That's not the same. I posted a PVP guide because I know PVP and a particular rule set. In most rule sets, objections can be made IC and OoC. That detail is unique to this forum, and was not accounted for. And that OoC rule was exploited in your favor seeing, very clearly, that I objected to...

I don't even care that Bauren attacked me. No outright offense to Bauren, but if we did fight, I don't frankly think it would have been a contest. I mean, there's a grotesque mistake in his post. And it's one he consistently makes through other posts. He's not detail oriented. He seems to...

Lol I'd feel comfortable calling someone in on this. Cause honestly, there's CLEAR contest. You literally did something outright wrong. Lol. I said it, explicitly. IC or otherwise, it shouldn't matter if you're just wrong. But we'll see.

Well this is relevant right now. If my IC posts contests, where does this stand? From my background, you can offer in character objects and corrections if things are glaringly wrong. You know, say that you just imagined time doesn't exist and ignored it completely in a post.

I'm calling BS on this and hoping to get a second opinion involved. It was brought to my attention that I should have voiced my complaint in the OoC thread, but my objection is clear and time-stamped in my post as occurring PRIOR to @Bauren posting. It can be seen in the hidden spoiler at the...

@Phœnix @Vosrik I'm with him on this actually. If I post and say something was done, yeah. It's locked in. If I, as your opponent, accept a hit or action, then I can't later contest it when it's convenient. I'm on board. Also, to the other point, I get that. There is a limit to how far back I...

@Reya Starlyght I agree that never do a lot of actions is a good personal rule, but you can't really make that a rule because it's circumstantial. It really depends on the variables at play. However, and I'm speaking here from my perspective, the notion that actions cannot be taken back is...