The only IC justification I can think of is that he really severely misspoke, and his misstatement had severe consequences.
Mav, and all other congressmen/women, be on the look out for Mav's PC impeachment proceedings.
I'll have the thread up soon.
Also keep in mind that I am thinking of modeling the impeachment proceeding after the US Impeachment Proceedings.
One, the body (current congress members) first pass, by a simple majority of those present and voting, articles of impeachment (in Mav's case it's for the Mando thread...), which constitute the formal allegation or allegations.
Two, upon the above's passage, Mav's PC will be tried by the body (congress).
Three, to convict the Mav's PC, a two-thirds majority of the body (congress) present is required. Upon conviction, Mav's PC will be automatically removed from office.
Two, upon the above's passage, Mav's PC will be tried by the body (congress).
Three, to convict the Mav's PC, a two-thirds majority of the body (congress) present is required. Upon conviction, Mav's PC will be automatically removed from office.
EDIT: Also, congress members, remember this thread needs your attention.
Thus far, only one member has responded. Let's get to it soon.
Last edited by a moderator: