- Joined
- Nov 27, 2005
- Messages
- 17,704
- Reaction score
- 75
Now to start, again Im sorry I let RL matters tie me down, and got complacent with " reports" that said things were fine when I checked in, and didn't probe much deeper. Im doing what I can to assure that wont happen again.
now as for the battles:
Last I saw at the blockade, Riaf was active...as he's all that really need to be... however: This was a blockade in the middle of nowhere. it's point was to stall and delay and do some potential damage if they could, but fall back when things got to hot and fall into a secondary position further along the lines ( this would post a different encounter later) so it's NOT imperative It's likely to fall back anyway.
now for Tanaab:
the sunday deadline, and thats obviously not something that can be met without problems...even if I posted a complete military thing now, it would draw out, and still be riddled with problems because tenssions are already running far too high for it to go over smoothly. so Im about to propose this to get a fresh start:
Im not going to protect calist, and show it by letting his fleet get decimated I cant do this off and on leaving things half done/started events anymore... and I want to make it very clear that Im not going to stand for it, it's not fair for anyone else. this is a bad bad habit that has plagued every single battle, he's just one of several who have made this too too common, capture kill fall back whatever, but hes not getting out of this unscathed..
Saint posted npc local defenses to try and help to keep ground defenses
this would really be more of a resistance....so it's ongoing small guerrilla style just to keep things busy.... even if it's a post to show that the locals are not going down easy but over all not have any major impact on the current battle other than " the locals are fighting out" which is expected...so we can play with that as more of a situational thing later
I had, at the very onset of the thread moved ru out and AROUND the system to sit there and keep hutts form coming in...basically sit on their back door... I can just as easy get him bolstered and send him back in soon enough before the hutts can get fully established, but it would be considered a completely secondary battle as days would elapse
that is to say Ru was deployed after the hutts showed up and behind them a system away on that route from the start. He's still there, given the change in pitch it's going to force time to get him a full force to go back in to retake...
but going in on the offensive before hutts could heavily set up shop and the population is less than sedated does have it's advantages true to some degree, but more over it lets both sides be able to come at it with a fresh mind later
so at the end of it Hutts do gain a tentative control of Tanaab, with a pending counter attack to come within a few days from the other fleet we had away and out of the battle but in the theater.
least thats what Im heavily considering.
now as for the battles:
Last I saw at the blockade, Riaf was active...as he's all that really need to be... however: This was a blockade in the middle of nowhere. it's point was to stall and delay and do some potential damage if they could, but fall back when things got to hot and fall into a secondary position further along the lines ( this would post a different encounter later) so it's NOT imperative It's likely to fall back anyway.
now for Tanaab:
the sunday deadline, and thats obviously not something that can be met without problems...even if I posted a complete military thing now, it would draw out, and still be riddled with problems because tenssions are already running far too high for it to go over smoothly. so Im about to propose this to get a fresh start:
Im not going to protect calist, and show it by letting his fleet get decimated I cant do this off and on leaving things half done/started events anymore... and I want to make it very clear that Im not going to stand for it, it's not fair for anyone else. this is a bad bad habit that has plagued every single battle, he's just one of several who have made this too too common, capture kill fall back whatever, but hes not getting out of this unscathed..
Saint posted npc local defenses to try and help to keep ground defenses
this would really be more of a resistance....so it's ongoing small guerrilla style just to keep things busy.... even if it's a post to show that the locals are not going down easy but over all not have any major impact on the current battle other than " the locals are fighting out" which is expected...so we can play with that as more of a situational thing later
I had, at the very onset of the thread moved ru out and AROUND the system to sit there and keep hutts form coming in...basically sit on their back door... I can just as easy get him bolstered and send him back in soon enough before the hutts can get fully established, but it would be considered a completely secondary battle as days would elapse
that is to say Ru was deployed after the hutts showed up and behind them a system away on that route from the start. He's still there, given the change in pitch it's going to force time to get him a full force to go back in to retake...
but going in on the offensive before hutts could heavily set up shop and the population is less than sedated does have it's advantages true to some degree, but more over it lets both sides be able to come at it with a fresh mind later
so at the end of it Hutts do gain a tentative control of Tanaab, with a pending counter attack to come within a few days from the other fleet we had away and out of the battle but in the theater.
least thats what Im heavily considering.