View Full Version : Which Trilogy should have gone first?
Adamis
06-12-2007, 06:24 AM
Ok so basicly which do you think would have been better to have gone first, the New Trilogy or the Original Trilogy. If the New won had gone first we would have the (slight) surprise of Anakin marrying Padme, Anakin falling and becoming Darth Vadar but we would miss out on the surprise of "Luke, I am your Father!" and "Leia's my sister."
So what do you guys think?
Brandon Rhea
06-12-2007, 10:48 AM
The original. Not because of the suprises, but because the prequels would have been impossible to do back in the day.
Green Ranger
06-12-2007, 11:11 AM
The Original Trilogy. I still watch the OT first before going back to the Prequel trilogy. It's like a flashback of sorts for me. Plus watchign the Prequels first kills almost every plot twist in the OT, no matter how many times I watch it.
I still think that they could have made ROTS more complimentary to those who feel like watching the prequels first.
Johnny
06-12-2007, 10:57 PM
I say the surprises should keep the original up. "I am your father!" No friggin duh I knew. Luke and Leia are brother and sister?! Ya they are twins. Plus ya it wouldn't have looked as cool but I just kinda hate how half is dated but has a great story and one looks freakin awesome but is a bit of a dissapointment
Augustus
06-12-2007, 11:13 PM
Ot is and will always be the greatest trilogy of movies ever.
The OT.
They need to add a clip of that Binks bugger being blown up though.
Brandon Rhea
06-14-2007, 03:41 AM
Please explain how adding in Jar Jar Binks dying would NOT be a deliberate attempt to please a minority of Star Wars fans that would mean absolutely nothing in context to the story of any of the three movies, the OT as a whole and the Saga as a whole.
sithboy7
06-14-2007, 09:22 PM
I think the orginals are good as first, beause they dont really explain the Republic or the Jedi in the new ones.
jediduncan
06-18-2007, 06:07 AM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Brandon Rhea @ Jun 14 2007, 03:41 AM) 167369</div>Please explain how adding in Jar Jar Binks dying would NOT be a deliberate attempt to please a minority of Star Wars fans that would mean absolutely nothing in context to the story of any of the three movies, the OT as a whole and the Saga as a whole.[/b]
I agree with Bac, they should edit them to kill Jar Jar Binks.
Augustus
06-18-2007, 09:36 PM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Brandon Rhea @ Jun 14 2007, 04:41 AM) 167369</div>Please explain how adding in Jar Jar Binks dying would NOT be a deliberate attempt to please a minority of Star Wars fans that would mean absolutely nothing in context to the story of any of the three movies, the OT as a whole and the Saga as a whole.[/b]
Same reason he has a tiny role in 2 and 3.
Not only did he annoy EVERYONE...Many considered him to be racist.
Outside world effects star wars 101 :unworthy:
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.